Literary Wives Book Club (Sept 2025): Novel About My Wife by Emily Perkins

Literary Wives is an on-line book group that examines the meaning and role of wife in different books. Every other month, we post and discuss a book with this question in mind: What does this book say about wives or about the experience of being a wife? 

Don’t forget to check out the other members of Literary Wives to see what they have to say about the book!

Other participants:
Novel About My Wife by Emily Perkins



Last book club we reviewed The Constant Wife by W Somerset Maugham (read my review here). When I finished The Constant Wife I appreciated its take on marriage and the power dynamics within. In contrast, Novel About My Wife fell a little flat for me. 

The central wife in Novel About My Wife is Ann. But in truth, the story is told entirely from Tom’s point of view (her husband) and feels like it speaks more about him than her. The title promises a novel about a wife, but what we really get is a husband narrating a sotry about his wife to the reader, ostensibly to keep her memory her alive but he may have other motives. Tom tells us that Ann is an Australia he met while she was living in London. He doesn't know much about her past or even why she is living in London. But he falls in love and marries her. They buy a house and when the story begins they are expecting their first child. 


At the beginning of the narrative, Ann is caught in an underground train derailment which undoutedly impacts her mental health. She descends into anxiety, believing that she is being followed by a stalker and sometimes obsessively cleaning their home. It eventually seems likely that her issues began before the train accident, but it is never certain. We see her only through Tom’s eyes and his interpretation of her behaviour. Can we even be certain that he is being honest with us?  ,  The novel never gives her a voice and we can only speculate and infer from what Tim recounts. There is a traumatic event hinted at in her past, that potentially is a defining even in her life that may or may not being related to the decline in her mental health. Is the stalker a delusion created by her mental health struggles or are the mental health struggles the delusion and the stalker real and somehow connected to her past? We know that Ann passes away (not a spoiler) and it's implied, butonly implied, that she died by suicide. The traumatic event that defines her is never explained. 


In short - I did not enjoy this book. 


To delve into this more deeply - I found the ambiguity frustrating. I wanted to understand what was going on with Ann. I wanted to know what had happened to her in the past that cast such a shadow. I wanted to know how she died and whether there might have been anything suspicious about it. 


Perhaps I could have exercised my little grey cells and drawn my own conclusions, but I never got that spark. The gaps felt empty and the book didn’t inspire me to search for answers, only frustrated that I didn't have any. Is the fact that the story is narrated by a husband about his wife's death and yet he has called it a "novel" some clue to my confusion? If anyone else who has read this has their own theories, please let me know. 


So what does this novel say about wives?


Honestly, for a novel called Novel About My Wife, I think tha tthis story says something more about Tom, the husband. If I had to say something, I was would say that the novel suggests that a wife can still be unknown to the person thought to love them more than most others. Ann is only defined by Tom's observations and projections. Tom himself admits to not knowing much about her past, but he also has little curiosity, even though the very fact of her being less than forth coming suggests something important and hidden. He takes her at face value, but is also dismissive of her. He might say that he loves her, but does he know her? Can you love someone that you don't know?


In the end, I'm not really sure what it says about the experience of being a wife and I have no love of the story. It felt more like an ambiguous retelling (potentially even a confession, but of what I'm not sure) of events from a husband who never really cared to understand his wife. Maybe there's something there - that people see you as a wife or partner, but rarely as yourself without that context. 


If your idea of a satisfying read involves clarity, emotion and a satisfying plot then this book is not for you. 

6 comments

  1. Like you, I didn't get on well with this book at all! Too much left unresolved (especially the role of Hallie... even if Ann was linked to him in some way, it didn't make sense that he re-entered her life in such a malicious and persistent way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was quite a bit that was a bit convenient about the plot. I know sometimes authors, directors etc need to do that to move the plot along, but it didn't help the book in this case

      Delete
  2. It looks like I can comment today! I didn't find the ambiguity a problem, but I think you're right that this, almost by definition, is more about the husband than the wife. I took it to be about him being confused and trying to bring together the threads to understand her, but I also didn't notice a lot of grief. I think it's a fair point that this might be a case of an unreliable narrator. But it's a fair point. Do we really know anyone else?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think maybe he wanted us to think that he was trying to unhderstand her, but it felt a little more like he was trying to justify himself to me and their definitely wasn't a lot of grief. Some maybe, but also maybe more guilt

      Delete
  3. I felt very similarly. Tom doesn't at all fulfil his stated goal of recreating his wife in words, but I agree that this may have been Perkins's point: one can never fully know their spouse.

    ReplyDelete