I went into Conclave not really knowing what to expect, which is often the best way to read a book. I ended up listening to it as an audiobook, and that turned out to be a great choice. The narration by Roy McMillan was excellent and really suited the tone of the story. This was one of those books where I kept looking for excuses to keep listening.
The novel is set almost entirely within the Vatican, following the death of a pope and the closed-door process of electing his successor. Cardinal Lomeli is tasked with overseeing the conclave, responsible for keeping order and ensuring the rules are followed as the cardinals gather and voting begins. As the days pass, tensions rise, alliances shift, and secrets start to surface. What looks, on the surface, like a solemn and sacred process slowly reveals itself to be far more complicated.
What surprised me most about this book was how compulsive it was. There is very little in the way of obvious action. No chase scenes, no dramatic confrontations. Instead, the tension builds quietly and steadily through character, atmosphere, and the gradual uncovering of what each man wants and what he is willing to hide.
Harris really leans into the reality of religious leadership. There is surprisingly little actual religion in the book. Faith exists, but it often feels secondary to ambition, power, ego, and fear. These are men who are supposed to be spiritual leaders, but they are also ego-driven men in power and that tension makes the whole thing feel unsettlingly real.
The setting adds to that sense of claustrophobia. Locked rooms, whispered conversations, carefully chosen words, and the constant sense that everyone is watching everyone else. By the time the story reaches its conclusion, the pressure has built so effectively that even small moments feel loaded with meaning.
I did not expect to enjoy this as much as I did, but I found it hard to stop. It is smart, tense, and quietly gripping, and the audiobook format only heightened that experience. This was a really satisfying read, especially if you enjoy novels where the drama comes from people, not plot twists or spectacle (although I'm not going to lie, there is a plot twist).
4 stars: for being such a compulsive read.
I picked up Piranesi after hearing it recommended on the ABC Radio National Top 100 Books of the 21st Century countdown, and it turned out to be one of those books that feels quietly special while you are reading it, and then keeps revisiting you afterwards.
The story is told through the journals of Piranesi, who lives in an enormous House made up of endless halls filled with statues. The lower levels flood with the tides, the upper levels are dry and calm, and the House seems to provide everything he needs (albeit not much). There is only one other person in his world, someone he calls the Other, who visits occasionally and is searching for some kind of hidden knowledge. As Piranesi records his days, small details begin to feel off, and gradually you realise that there is much more going on than he understands.
That is about as much as I want to say about the plot, because this really is a book you should discover slowly.
What I loved most about Piranesi was the feeling of it. The world is mysterious and magical, but it also feels incredibly real. Clarke builds it so carefully that you accept it almost without question, even when you do not fully understand how it works. I could see it clearly in my head, and I did not want to leave it.
In a strange way, it reminded me of the stories I used to make up as a child. Those imagined worlds that felt complete and absorbing and totally logical while you were inside them. I think that has a lot to do with Piranesi himself. He moves through his world with such openness and appreciation. He delights in it. He notices things. He is grateful for what he has. That straightforward way of seeing made the book feel both gentle and profound.
The writing is beautiful but very restrained. It never feels like it is trying too hard. The mystery unfolds slowly, and even when the book ends, it feels like there is still more there to think about. I finished it with the sense that I had not fully unpacked everything yet, and I liked that.
I kept wishing I was reading this as part of a book club. It feels like the kind of book that would only get better through conversation, because there is so much in it that could be interpreted and discussed. Power, knowledge, memory, identity, and the stories we tell ourselves.
This is strange, thoughtful, and beautifully made. I really loved it.
I’ve really enjoyed the Thursday Murder Club series. It has been one of those dependable, easy reading comfort series for me, with familiar characters and just enough mystery to keep things moving. I picked up The Impossible Fortune expecting more of the same but this one really let me down.
The story kicks off at Joyce’s daughter’s wedding, which should be a fun starting point. During the celebrations, Elizabeth is quietly approached by a man who claims someone is trying to kill him. From there, the Thursday Murder Club finds itself tangled up in a complicated mystery involving missing money, secret storage facilities, and people who are not quite who they seem. As usual, the group pokes around, asks questions, and follows a trail of clues.
That's the plot but the problem for me was that none of it felt interesting. The mystery itself was boring and instead of building real tension, the book relies heavily on chapters that end with mini cliffhangers. After a while this just became annoying rather than compelling.
By the middle of the book I was already losing interest, and toward the end I was skimming just to see how it would all wrap up. The resolution, when it finally arrived, felt flat and anti-climactic. There was no real sense of surprise or satisfaction, just a feeling that I had spent a lot of time getting to a fairly underwhelming conclusion.
What disappointed me most is that this book felt like a repetition of ideas from earlier in the series without the spark that made those books work. The characters are still likeable, but they are no longer enough to carry the story on their own. Everything started to blur together, and the whole thing felt like much of a muchness.
I did finish it, but more out of obligation than enjoyment. After loving this series for so long, it is a shame to say that this might be where I stop. The Impossible Fortune was not terrible, but it was boring, and that is somehow worse.
If you are a long-time fan, you might still want to read it just to keep up with the characters. But for me, this one confirmed that my time with the Thursday Murder Club may be over.
WWW Wednesday is a meme that is hosted by Taking on a World of Words. It's a very simple premise of sharing with others The Three Ws:
What are you currently reading?
What did you recently finish reading?
What do you think you’ll read next?
What am I currently reading?
I am currently reading The Winter Garden by Kristin Hannah. I really enjoyed The Women last year and have The Nightinglale on my TBR list for this year. Hannah's books are so easy to read - from the moment I start reading them I am engaged and it feels so natural, like I am there with the characters. The Winter Garden is about the relationship between two young girls and their cold mother, as they come to understand more about her and how she came to be the way that she is.
I am also re-reading The Seven Dials Mystery by Agatha Christie ahead of the release of the netflix adaption shortly.
What did I just finish?
What will I read next?
Who knows? Where ever my mood takes me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Books completed | 75 |
| Fiction | 72 |
| Non-fiction | 3 |
| Australian authors | 25 |
| Female authors | 61 |
| Translated fiction | 2 |
| Crime fiction | 39 |
| Re-reads | 21 |
2025 was a steady reading year for me. I returned to familiar voices, found comfort and order in crime fiction, supported Australian authors, and mostly chose books that could live alongside my busy life rather than take me away from it.
- Golden Age crime (Agatha Christie, Dorothy L Sayers, Ngaio March)
- Series detectives (Jacqueline Winspear, Kerry Greenwood, Dervla Tiernan, Robert Galbraith), and
- Contemporary Australian crime (Benajamin Stevenson, Jane Harper, Christopher White, Sulari Gentill).
- Crime (Kerry Greenwood, Jane Harper, Bejamin Stevenson, Sulari Gentill)
- Contemporary fiction (Madeleine Grey)
- Literary fiction (Charlotte Wood, Hannah Kent, Peter Carey)
- Non-fiction / Memoir (Hannah Kent, Helen Garner).
- Han Kang
- Colson Whitehead
- Percival Everett
- Peter Carey
- RF Kuang
- Min Jin Lee
- Ann Patchett
- Claire Keegan
- Small Things Like These
- The Soul of Kindness
- Bel Canto
- Pachinko
- The Women
- Wicked
The meme is hosted by Books are My Favourite Best and is described thus: On the first Saturday of every month, a book is chosen as a starting point and linked to six other books to form a chain. Readers and bloggers are invited to join in by creating their own ‘chain’ leading from the selected book. Each person’s chain will look completely different. It doesn’t matter what the connection is or where it takes you – just take us on the journey with you.
This month is wildcard month, with the request that we start with either the last book in our December chain, or the last book that we read in 2025. I didn't participate in the meme in December, so I am starting this month with the last book I read in 2025, which was Brooklyn by Colm Toibin. I was very taken with this book, as I am sure many other people have been before me. It follows the story of Eilis, a young Irish woman who migrates from Ireland to New York in the 1950s in search of work and a new life. It's about migraton and homesickness and understanding where you belong in the world. It was so easy to read, I felt I slipped into the world and didn't emerge again until the novel was complete.
Devotion by Hannah Kent (referenced here) is another beautiful and this time lyrical work of fiction about migration of people looking for a new life and a protagonist who is driven to remain where she feels she belongs, alongside those that she loves.
The Book Thief by Markus Zusak (my review here). Without saying too much, the beyond the grave narration in The Book Thief connects it in my mind to Devotion by Hannah Kent, not to mention that they are both written by two of my faviourite Australian authors.
Unfinished Business by Sulari Gentill (my review here). This is a bit of a jump, but this came to mind next because it is authored by another Australian author who I have read a lot of. I particularly love Gentill's Rowland Sinclair Mysteries, but I thought of Unfinished Business because I have been reflecting on my 2025 reading and particularly on the high concenration of crime fiction that I explored.
Heavenly Pleasures by Kerry Greenwood. I turn next to Heavenly Pleasures as it was the last work of crime fiction that I read in 2025. Kerry Greenwood's Phryne Fisher series has a special place in my heart and I was upset to hear of her passing earlier this year. I decided to explore her Corinna Chapman series and was disappointed to find that I didn't enjoy it all. There was so much minute description of everything that the characters did - from opening doors and watching television to cooking dinner and doing the laundry. I think that was part of what the charm of the series is supposed to be but I was bored by it.
Green Dot by Madeleine Gray (my review here). What connects Heavely Pleasures to Greent Dot is that they are both rooted in their respective cities, Melbourne of Heavely Pleasures and Sydney for Green Dot, and both use real landmarks and streets and suburds to situate their stories in real contemporary Australia. In both books the city is an important part of the setting the mood of each novel. With Green Dot in particular I was familiar with many of the places and suburbs mentioned which contributed to how I visualised the novel as I read.
Orbital by Samantha Harvey (referenced here). Not an obvious choice but Harvey in Orbital equally created a strong sense of place, albeit in an unconventional way. Rather than being set in a city or even a country, Orbital is set in a shared shifting envirfonment of a space station. There is constant movement as the world spins underneath them, and yet the characters and still and unmoving in their small cacoon above us all.
|
|
With that in mind I thought I would have a quick look at the 3 books I abandoned in 2025.
The first was Joe Cinque's Consolation by Helen Garner. Joe Cinque was in the ABC Radio National Top 100 Books of the 21st Century Count Down, which was my reminder to pick it up. It's written by one of Australia's most talented authors and covers the trial of a famous murder case in the Australia Capital Territory. It's often hailed as a meaningful exploration of culpability, evil and the gap between moral behaviour and the law. It seems that many people have a strong emotional reaction to this book, finding significance of Garner's exploration of these themes. I didn't and I believe I know why. For some years I was a trial lawyer, responsible for defending many accused perpetrators of terrible crimes. I've had occasion to see these issues first hand. I've seen the awful things that people can do to one another. I've seen behind the scenes the awful things that have often been done to them earlier in their lives. I've seen where the law convergers from what would commonly be thought of as fairness. It's usually for a reason that hard to discern. I couldn't finish the book because it wasn't anything that I hadn't see or explored myself.
The second was Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind by Yuval Noah Hurari. This was another one that the ABC count down had recommended to me, but that ultimately I found the pace a little slow and the information a little uninteresting to my particular tastes.
The third was A Gentlemen in Moscow by Amor Towles. I really wanted and expected to enjoy this book, especially when it came third in the ABC Radio National Top 100 Books of the 21st Century Count Down. And yet, despite giving it a good go, I didn't find myself becoming lost in the story in the way that I expected. It might be that I needed to perservere a little longer - I could see that it was a more of a character driven slow-burn novel. Unfortunately though, I had borrowed this one from the library and it soon became clear that I wasn't going to finish it before it was due to be returned. So, I returned it early. Unlike Sapiens, however, I won't give up on this one entirely. With any luck it will reappear in my 2026 reading list as a finished book.








