Literary Wives Book Club (December 2025): The Soul of Kindness by Elizabeth Taylor

 Literary Wives is an on-line book group that examines the meaning and role of wife in different books. Every other month, we post and discuss a book with this question in mind: What does this book say about wives or about the experience of being a wife? 

Don’t forget to check out the other members of Literary Wives to see what they have to say about the book!

Other participants:

The Soul of Kindness by Elizabeth Taylor



I have to begin this review by admitting that not only had a I never read anything by Elizabeth Taylor, I had never heard of this author before. I want to begin by acknowledging that is one of the things i hav eenjoyed the most about joining the Literary Wives Book Club - it's making me step outside my comfort zone and read books that I wouldn't have otherwise chosen myself. 

Onto the review. 

My first observation of about the The Soul of Kindness is that Taylor did an excellent job of writing about every day life while still having a go at the characters and the society in which they live. The Soul of Kindness seems very polite and straightforward. There is a lot of polite conversation, pouring of tea, living a very English life from times gone by. At times, I admit, I found this a little slow. But this book is also a very sharp look at marriage and about the roles women get pushed into, especially wives.


What does The Soul of Kindness say about wives or the experience of being a wife?


There are probably a lot of different ways to think about wives in The Soul of Kindness, but I am going to tackle it by thinking about two of the characters, Flora and Barbara. Both say something quite different about what marriage can do to people and if I am honest it was Barbara's relationship with Percy that I found most interesting and modern. 


Understanding Flora

Flora is the centre of the book, or at least it starts that way until the cast of characters and their stories start to grow around her. She is beautiful and adored. Everyone talks about her as if she is pure goodness and she (narcissistically) even believes this about herself. But her version of kindness comes from never thinking too hard about anyone else’s perspective. She drifts along through life, assuming that people welcome her and that everyone will fall into line with how she sees things and what she watns. She is completely incapable of putting herself in the shoes of others or seeing things from a different perspective to her own. There is Flora and Flora alone in her world. 


That's how she causes harm  that complete blankness to another person's perspective and experience. Flora genuinely thinks she is helping when she steers people into choices they do not want. She encourages a friend's borther Kit to pursue acting even though he is not suited to it. She pushes her husband's father and his long-term lover Barbara into marriage because she cannot imagine a long term relationship that doesn’t follow her blueprint. She is the sort of wife who looks perfect from the outside but who causes strain and stress whenever she is in the room. 


The message around Flora seems to be that being a good wife isn't about sweetness or prettiness or the right sort of manners. Flora has these things, but is she a good wife? I think Taylor is trying to say that kindness without any self awareness, or awareness of others, can be incredibly damaging. To be honest, I think calling it kindness is a stretch. It feels more as though Flora does these things because it suits her ego to feel that she is 'helping' others. 


Flora’s marriage to Richard feels almost like a performance. He sometimes seems besotted with her but she never really sees him or understands him. The result is a marriage that looks lovely but has very little real connection inside it. Interestingly I see paralells here with the last two books, Novel About My Wife by Emily Perkins and The Constant Wife by W Somerset Maugham. These all have in common marriages where there is a lack of connection.


Barbara as an accidental wife

Then there is Barbara, who quietly provides a completely different picture. Before Flora meddles in their lives, Barbara and Percy are living in a comfortable, slightly unconventional arrangement. They enjoy each other, they spend time together, but they also have their own lives and their own space. It works for them. They allow Flora to pressue them into marriage, and everything shifts for them. What was once easy and light becomes forced and heavy. Without marriage they were free to live their lives in a way that felt more authentic to them. In marrying, they fell into more traditional roles that didn't suit them. 


It is such an interesting contrast. With Flora, marriage becomes a stage for her self image and narcissism. She can be admired as a lovely person and wife. With Barbara, marriage becomes a disruption. It pulls apart something that was working and replaces it with a version of togetherness that neither of them actually wanted.


So what does this book say about wives? I think Taylor is saying that the concept of 'wife' can be incredibly limiting if it is defined by other people’s expectations. Flora tries to be the perfect wife but there is no real connection in her marriage and she ends up causing harm through her lack of empahy. 


Barbara never set out to be anyone’s idea of a wife at all and ends up struggling once she is forced into that shape. Earlier I referred to this as modern. What I mean to suggest is that I feel like it's a modern idea that relationships don't need to end in marriage. They can be successful, loving and full of meaningful connection without marriage. Once upon a time marriage was a necessary condition for long-term relationships. Women needed to pass from man to man and fulfill the role that society laid out for them. Perhaps Taylor was starting to wonder how necessary this was anymore.


Conclusion

In the end, the book suggests that marriage only works when people actually connect with each other in a way that is authentic to themselves. Both couples in this novel lose that. Flora cannot see anyone clearly, including herself. Barbara and Percy lose the easy rhythm they once had the moment they try to formalise it.


Did I enjoy the book?

I have to say, though, that while I can see why Elizabeth Taylor’s writing is so admired, I didn’t really connect with this one on a personal level. The writing is clearly skilful but overall I found the book a bit slow. I never quite clicked with the characters, even though I understood what she was doing with them. It’s one of those novels I can appreciate more than enjoy. I’m glad I finally read her, but I probably won’t be rushing out to pick up another any time soon.


Review: Everyone this Christmas Has a Secret by Benjamin Stevenson

 


I picked this up expecting something fun and quick and that is what I got. Everyone This Christmas Has a Secret sits firmly in the nlight entretainment zone and I mean that in a genuinely nice way. It is the kind of book you can zoom through in an afternoon because its fun and silly and you don't have to think very hard. Sometimes that is exactly what you want and need, especially at the end of the year when your brain has quietly tapped out.


Benjamin Stevenson has an easy chatty writing style, and that is still one of the best things about this series. The narrator's voice is strong and well defined. Stevenson keeps things moving along, keeps the jokes coming and gives you just enough mystery to feel like you are solving something without ever being stressed about it. 


That said, I am starting to feel like the charm of this series is wearing slightly thin. Like a lot of these cosy detective series, the more books there are, the more you feel the formula showing through. The characters still make me smile but some of the spark from the earlier books has faded a bit. I found myself caring less about the actual plot and even finding the fun approach a little less.... funny.


Still, I enjoyed it. It was exactly the right book coming into the end of a tiring year. If you go in wanting something light, warm and a bit ridiculous, it absolutely does the job. I just hope the next one shakes things up a little, because I would love to feel that early-series energy again.



3 stars: It was good - enjoyable but forgettable



Review: The Hallmarked Man by Robert Galbraith


This is one of my all-time favourite series of books. I love detective fiction anyway, but the Cormoran Strike novels have something special. The characters are so unique and strongly drawn. I love the realism, the will-they-won’t-they tension between Strike and Robin, and the way the personal subplots (if not the mysteries themselves) always feel grounded in real life rather than too neat or contrived.


Before I talk about the book itself, I do want to acknowledge the controversy around J.K. Rowling. Her views are completely at odds with my own, and I don’t agree with her on a lot of things. But I continue to read her Robert Galbraith books because I’ve grown attached to these characters and this world. It’s possible, for me at least, to love a story even when I don’t share the author’s worldview.


The Hallmarked Man begins with a pretty gruesome discovery. A dismembered body is found in the vault of a silver shop in London. A client hires Strike and Robin to find out the truth, and the investigation winds through the world of silversmiths, the Freemasons, and family secrets. As always, the case is layered and complex, but what I really love about these books is the partnership at the centre of them.


The last book in the series (The Running Grave) was honestly far too long. I enjoyed it, but it could have used a serious trim. This one, thankfully, was shorter, which I really appreciated. It felt tighter and more focused. That said, I do think The Hallmarked Man was my least favourite in terms of story. It started to feel a bit repetitive with lots of scenes of Strike and Robin having the same conversations, circling around their misunderstandings, getting frustrated, and pulling back again. I found myself wanting something new between them.


Still, I love these characters too much to ever stop reading. It’s hard to see exactly how Strike and Robin will ever work as a couple, but I can’t wait for J.K. Rowling to finally get us there.



3 stars: I enjoyed this one.

WWW Wednesday: 5 November 2025

WWW Wednesday is a meme that is hosted by Taking on a World of Words. It's a very simple premise of sharing with others The Three Ws:


What are you currently reading? 
What did you recently finish reading? 
What do you think you’ll read next?


What am I currently reading?




It's been awhile since I read any non-fiction and this featured in ABC Radio National's countdown of the Top 100 Books of the 21st Century. I really enjoyed Bill Bryson's A Short History of Nearly Everything and so this one appealed to me. It's a lot more serious, and sometimes that way he writes about Australia's First Nations peoples doesn't sit well with me, but so far its... good. I mean, I'm not getting all excited about it, but its ok. 


What did I finish reading?




Again inspired by ABC Radio National's countdown of the Top 100 Books of the 21st Century, I just finished Piranesi by Susanna Clark. I really really liked it - highly recommend it. It's very unique and emotional and suspenseful and so many things. I need more time to reflect on it before I can properly describe it. 


What is up next?




Normally I don't plan ahead but I need to get my book club urgently so next up its The Soul of Kindness by Elizabeth Taylor for my Literary Wives Book Club. I know nothing about this book whatsoever and it's nice to approach a book from a completely neutral beginning. 

Review: Maisie Dobbs by Jacqueline Winspear


This one was recommended to me by a colleague who knows my taste in books, and she was absolutely right. Maisie Dobbs really hit the mark. I love detective fiction of the Agatha Christie kind, those clever mysteries with a sharp, observant lead. But this one felt different. It isn’t as light or cosy as some detective stories. It’s got a quiet sadness to it that come from the shadow  of the war and never quite lifts.


The story begins in 1929, when Maisie opens her own private investigation business in London. Her first case seems simple enough: a man wants her to find out if his wife is having an affair. But the more Maisie digs, the more she uncovers a much bigger and sadder story. The book moves between the case and Maisie’s past, showing how she went from being a housemaid to a Cambridge student to a nurse on the front lines of the First World War to a female detective.


The war is right at the heart of this book. It's part of the setting and of the characters. Everyone is carrying some kind of loss or regret from it, and Maisie is no exception. The mystery turns out to be less about who did what and more about understanding how people live with the things that happened to them.


Maisie herself is wonderful. She’s strong and moral and incredibly thoughtful, but there’s also a real gentleness to her. She wants to do the right thing, even when it’s hard. Watching her put the pieces together, both in the case and in people’s lives, is so satisfying.


I really enjoyed this book. It’s detective fiction, but with more depth and emotion than I expected. I’ve already read the second book in the series, and I’ll definitely be reading them all.



4 stars: I loved it. 

October 2025: What I read



 I am completely all over the place at the moment. In August I didn't read much at all. In September I went crazy and got through so many fabulous books. In October I hit an all year low - only finishing 3 books and abandoning 1 half way through. 


The three that I did manage to finish

Firstly, Harry Potter and the Dealthy Hallows by JK Rowling, a book I've read so many times I barely sure that it even count as a book read anymore. Then I listened to an audio book - Enter a Murderer by Ngaio Marsh which I really enjoyed. And the first book I read in the month of October was the latest in the THursday Murder Club series, The Impossible Fortune by Richard Osman. Definitely the worst in the series and to be honest bad enough that I will probably stop this series now. 


The book I abandoned

This is going to be highly controversial, but I abandoned Joe Cinque's Consolation by Helen Garner. I know this is in so many Top 100 books and one of the books that is often spoken about as one of her bests - but I couldn't get into it. I made it quite far, and I am determined to finish it, I just couldn't right now. 


Although I can see the appeal of the reflective tone, the challenge for me is that I used to work as a criminal defense lawyer and did quite a few jury trials during that time. I have personal experience of working with clients who have done terrible things for inconceivable reasons, which makes me less inclined to want to reflect on why people do these terrible things to one another. 


ABC Radio National's Top 100 Countdown of the Best Books of the 21st Century

All isn't lost though, I did spend a good week listening to the aforementioned countdown and have a quite a few thoughts which I share another day. 


Six degrees of separation (Nov): From We have Always Lived in the Castle to Bel Canto

The meme is hosted by Books are My Favourite Best and is described thus: On the first Saturday of every month, a book is chosen as a starting point and linked to six other books to form a chain. Readers and bloggers are invited to join in by creating their own ‘chain’ leading from the selected book. Each person’s chain will look completely different. It doesn’t matter what the connection is or where it takes you – just take us on the journey with you.




This month’s chain starts with We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson. Not only have I never read this, but I've never even heard much about before now. From what I understand, it’s a gothic story about two sisters living in isolation after a family tragedy. It sounds eerie and full of dark family secrets. 


That immediately makes me think of The Turn of the Screw by Henry James, another unsettling tale in which an isolated house becomes a character of its own. 


From there, I’m moving to Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier, which also has the grand house, the secrets, the ever-present sense of dread. 


My next link is Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë. Both books centre on young women discovering their strength amid loneliness and mystery. And of course, there’s the appeal of a dark, brooding man with secrets.


From Jane Eyre, I’m leaping to Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys, which tells the story from the other side of Mrs Rochester. I didn't enjoy this books at all but it does reframe a classic and remind us that every story depends on who’s telling it.


That brings me to The Book Thief by Markus Zusak, one of my very favourite books of all time and happily voted as number 2 in the ABC Radio National's Top 100 Books of the 21st Century recent countdown. I thought of this one because it is a story that commonly appears in fiction, but reframed as a tale told from the perspective of death - that tells the story of a family brought together by circumstance and having to come together i nextreme circumstances. It's above love and what it means to be human.


Finally, that leads me to Bel Canto by Ann Patchett, which is less about what happens and more about the people at its heart. It’s a story about strangers drawn together by crisis, learning to create a kind of family out of circumstance.


So there’s my chain. It's perhaps a little dark but if I were trying to think in a good light I would say that they about connection and people trying to make sense of those around them.